With multiple stakeholders, including investors and consumers, paying more attention and interest to how a company is run in their community, the bottom line is this: the higher the corruption, the lower the market valuations. As it should be, ethical lapses should not condone by the industry.
“Virtue seems to pay, at least over the longer term,” said Charles M.C. Lee, an expert on markets and accounting at Stanford Graduate School of Business, regarding the issue of anti-corruption. Professor Lee’s research shows that ethical lapses matter in the market value of companies.
The shipping industry definitely cannot afford more bad news as it is already widely perceived as rife with corruption. For many companies and countries alike, corruption is seen as a local custom. Added to this is the fact that the industry is not transparent and does not have a mature anti-corruption compliance culture.
On the other hand, trade has grown tremendously and maritime transport is essential to global trade. Over 90 percent of trade is carried by sea as it is by far the most cost-effective way. Thus, a transparent and competitive shipping industry will benefit all parties involved.
However, a few bad actors engaging in illicit activities and corruption risk sullying the reputation and bringing down the financial valuation of individual company as well as the entire industry.
According to Prof Lee, companies in countries perceived as less corrupt trade at higher valuation than those in countries considered more corrupt. The market will price companies in more corrupt regimes as if they are worth less. He opinied that corruption can dampen shareholder value in a number of ways.
- A climate of malfeasance tends to reduce expectations of future corporate profitability
- Highly corrupt environments often have weaker protection of minority shareholders. As such, controlling shareholders can “creatively divert” money from the company, thus hurting minority shareholders
- In addition, the costs of capital can be higher in corrupt countries, which are perceived as riskier by investors
“Collectively as a country, when you’re on average more corrupt, you have to pay for that when markets look at you and when capital providers come into your country,” said Prof Lee. Also, there’s evidence linking corruption to lower economic growth and less foreign direct investment, among others.
Corruption kills competitiveness
When a company has to divert resources to deal with corruption, then the competitiveness of the company to turn those resources into profit is reduced. In turn, whatever inefficiencies and cost will be passed on to the customers in the form of artificially inflated prices. This is definitely not sustainable in the long term.
Another major issue comes when corruption, being unpredictable and uncontrollable, can exponentially increase business risks by changing the playing field unexpectedly. Lastly, corruption always fuel other criminal activities.
Investors, in going through their due diligence, will uncover all these facts and they will not be thrill at the prospect of investing in a company that is embroiled in corruption, to say the least. All investors will steer clear of such circumstances and won’t touch a company or for that matter, an industry, that they perceive as corrupt.
Therefore, the CEOs of shipping companies must address this ever-present issue of corruption so as to protect and uplift the reputation of their companies and the industry. This will directly and positively influence the financial valuation of their companies.
Executives can take preventive and corrective actions now or risk financial losses in the future as governments intervene and bog down the industry with regulation and micromanagement.