Global growth forecasts for 2026 present a relatively optimistic picture, with projected global GDP growth at 3.3% for 2026 and 3.2% for 2027 according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, within the freight market, caution is warranted due to a disconnect between optimistic economic projections and actual shipping volumes. Alan Murphy, CEO of Sea-Intelligence, points to ongoing effects from President Donald Trump’s global trade war, which has created a ripple effect through the freight market.
Murphy highlights a “front-loading” phenomenon in 2025, where importers accelerated shipments in anticipation of changing trade policies. This has led to an expectation of slower trade growth, as actual shipment volumes may diminish in 2026. The IMF’s trade outlook is criticized for being primarily value-driven, focusing on higher-valued technology exports rather than the physical volume of goods moved in shipping containers. This creates a misleading scenario for stakeholders in container shipping.
As shipping lines face declines in actual cargo volumes, overcapacity is becoming a significant issue. With some ocean carriers returning to the Red Sea after a period of heightened risks from Houthi rebel attacks, the need for additional vessels on longer trade routes has decreased. The reduction in vessel demand contributed to A.P. Moller-Maersk’s announcement of 1,000 job cuts due to a 23% drop in average freight rates in the fourth quarter.
U.S. ports, including the Port of Long Beach, experienced record container volumes in 2025 largely due to front-loading. This trend saw a shift in trade from China to Southeast Asian countries, which now account for a larger share of trade volumes for the port. Ongoing tariff uncertainties, further exacerbated by mixed policy announcements from Trump, add to the complexities facing the supply chain. Experts refer to the situation as a “double‑squeeze,” where suppressed volumes from 2025 combine with higher U.S. tariff costs.
In the U.S., while the freight market is expanding, concerns arise from tariff-induced inflation that is affecting shipping costs. According to January data from the Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI), warehousing prices are stabilizing, reflecting a decrease in inventories, while inventory prices surged. The LMI registered a score of 59.6, indicating significant expansion in logistics, though it shows a year-over-year decline.
The growing costs in transportation and inventory lead to questions about their impacts on the economy. Higher rates might signal an improving economy, yet they are also influenced by tariffs. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent argues that tariffs are not inflationary, but many analysts counter that the soaring transportation and inventory prices correlate with tariff impacts as much as economic recovery. This uncertainty complicates the outlook for stakeholders in the logistics industry as higher operational costs amplify the challenges already faced in the freight and trade markets. Overall, the interplay of political decisions, tariff trends, and shipping volumes paints a nuanced picture for the future of global trade.
Original publication date: [original_date]
