The updated implementation plan for Ireland’s Defence Forces has come under scrutiny following warnings of potential Russian hybrid attacks during Ireland’s upcoming EU presidency. While a minister acknowledged the likelihood of such threats, the government has delayed the execution of two critical recommendations aimed at developing infrastructure to counter hybrid warfare for several more years.
Recommendation 12 called for enhanced civil-military cooperation across government sectors to develop suitable structures and processes for countering hybrid warfare. Initially slated for evaluation by early 2025, its timeline has now been extended to late 2026. Similarly, a second recommendation emphasizing the need for military capabilities to address these threats has experienced a similar postponement from mid-2025 to late 2026.
Hybrid warfare encompasses various aggressive state activities short of traditional warfare, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and drone incursions. An official interview outlined Ireland’s focus on preventing incidents similar to those experienced by Denmark during its presidency, where drone incursions at airports led to multiple closures. Minister Thomas Byrne emphasized the necessity for preparedness, given the heightened risks in Europe.
The urgency of the situation became more pronounced after military-grade drones were identified near Irish waters following a visit from Ukrainian President Volodyr Zelenskyy, believed to be signaling to Ireland and the EU. Despite these alerts and a government commitment to fast-track counter-drone technologies, the Detailed Implementation Plan has postponed the expected arrival of vital counter-drone equipment until September 2026.
This conflicting narrative raises questions on Ireland’s capability to respond to hybrid threats. Despite recognizing the need for a comprehensive approach involving multiple departments—such as Defence, Justice, and Transport—there remains an absence of a cohesive structure or urgent action to address the evolving hybrid threats from Russia, especially against Ireland’s vital subsea infrastructure.
Experts critique the lack of prioritization and funding devoted to these urgent recommendations, calling attention to the government’s struggles to meet defense budgetary demands. Ireland’s defense spending remains notably low compared to other EU nations, further complicating its ability to effectively address modern security challenges.
As Ireland prepares to host a significant political summit, experts express concern over the lack of a clear National Security Strategy, which would provide a structure for cooperation among the key agencies involved in security and defense. Several voices in the article argue that effective countermeasures require structured planning and rehearsals, which currently seem inadequate.
The potential for hybrid attack incidents during the presidency looms, with the possibility that external support from neighboring states may not be efficiently coordinated, leading to a fragmented defense posture. The absence of critical counter-drone capabilities until 2026 is seen as a severe vulnerability and could embolden hostile actions against Ireland.
Calls for political leadership and a reassessment of Ireland’s defense strategy are pressing as the country navigates this complex security landscape, especially with an increasingly hostile geopolitical environment. As events unfold, Ireland’s readiness to tackle these hybrid threats remains uncertain, raising questions about its national and EU obligations amid growing security challenges.
Original publication date: [original_date]
