The case revolves around Mr. Yeo, the newly appointed CEO of Swiber, during a tumultuous period marked by financial distress as the company attempted to redeem SG$305 million (approximately US$227 million) in debt and secure new lenders. Amid these negotiations, Mr. Yeo became aware that the discussions were faltering and that a default was imminent.
In a controversial move, Mr. Yeo and his wife sold their debt holdings, circumventing losses amounting to SG$629,762 (about US$468,977), leveraging insider information to exit before the anticipated financial collapse. This action resulted in significant negative consequences for other debtholders, who ultimately faced substantial losses. The situation drew parallels to government intervention, reminiscent of the French government’s dramatic cash confiscation at an airport.
The Singapore authorities took action against Mr. Yeo, imposing fines of SG$5,000 (US$3,700) on him for failing to disclose his vested interest in the debentures sold by his wife. Furthermore, he was disqualified from serving as a director or holding a management role in any company for five years, joining other Swiber executives who faced similar sanctions. This incident underscores issues of corporate governance and ethics, particularly regarding insider trading and the responsibilities of company leaders in times of financial crisis.
Source link
